# What is The Big Bang Theory of life creation?

Because of its recognization by Vatican, the Big Bang Theory needs to be fully analyzed.

On a previous blog I talked about what is the general theory of relativity:

General Relativity is very simple. It is equivalent to one sentence:

There exists one and only one local inertial reference frame at any point of a spacetime manifold.

This is similar to the situation that

There exists one and only one local tangent plane at any point of a surface.

This single sentence is the famous Equivalence Principle of Einstein. It says: gravity is basically different from the other three interactions; gravitation can be cancelled out through the transformation of reference frames!

Einstein is right. Our body is subject and accustomed to the interaction of gravity on a daily basis. If you seek to get rid of gravity, it is simple. You get into an elevator and let the elevator fall at the speed of gravitational acceleration, then you feel no gravity. This elevator is an example of inertial reference frame where no gravity is present to any particle inside. Of course, you jump down from a tree, and your body suffers no action of gravity, but your fear of injury blocks all your wonderful feeling of weightlessness.

However, the weightless reference frame must be the local one. Einstein’s general theory of relativity allows only local reference frames. For example, if the human body was as big as the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco, the body would feel the action of gravity: the man would feel lightheaded or distorted.

If General Relativity was real, any global inertial reference frame would not exist in the reality.

Einstein changed gravity into a geometric thing: a small particle at gravitational interaction is equivalent to the one without interaction but living in a curved space-time!

For a curved space-time, there exist always the local tangent PLANEs which are the above-said local inertial reference frames.

However, life creation is a dynamic stuff. Women who have given birth to a child, know that baby birth is a dynamic thing and needs strength. High school students know that Newton’s first, second, and third laws are kinemaic thing, not dynamical ones. Newton proposed only one dynamical law in his whole life: the law of universal gravitation. Likewise, Hydromechanics is a kinematic stuff. All equations in Hydromechanics, e.g., Bernoulli’s equation, Navier-Stokes’ equation, are based on the principle of matter conservation. They are not dynamical equations. If someone could find a dynamical equation of earthquakes, then I would kneel down and admit he is my God!

Einstein wanted to become God, and deepened the curved-spacetime theory of gravity into a dynamical one. Einstein simulated Newton’s law of gravitation, and spent almost a decade’s time to build the dynamic equation. This is the Einstein field equation. The left side of the equation is the curvature tensor of curved spacetime while the right side is the energy-momentum tensor of real matter. Of course, its only guiding principle, i.e., its only connection to the natural world, is the point of view that the small-curvature limit of the equation is Newton’s law of gravitation.

However, the astronomical testification of general relativity played a trick: physicists secretly agree that the solar system admits a global inertial reference frame!

We can check out any textbook of astronomical testification of general relativity. Those textbooks claim that the curviliear coordinates x, y, z, r,t are directly the spatial distances or temporal interval. That is, x, y, z, t, etc. are global distances of global flat inertial reference frames!

This is contrary to the basic assumption of Einstein General Relativity. The basic assumption is that curved spacetime can not admit global inertial reference frame! In general relativity, the global physical quantity, e.g., the overall distance or time, must be the result of global path integration of the spacetime metric!

The concept of curved space-time is not a dynamical stuff. Curved space-time is just a stage. The people singing and dancing on the stage are dynamical ones.

In fact, all cosmological theories have a common assumption: the matter-energy distribution in the universe is homogeneous and isotropic. With the assumption, the left side of Einstein field equation does admit a solution, and the solution is the basis of The Big Bang theory of the universe!

I have already said that the curved space-time is just a stage. Could the curved spacetime of uniform matter distribution demonstrate any dynamic behavior? Yesterday, I took a view of Wiki pages, and found out that physicists admit that the Big Bang theory can not give any dynamical behavior of matter in the universe:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann%E2%80%93Lema%C3%AEtre%E2%80%93Robertson%E2%80%93Walker_metric

“Because the FLRW model assumes homogeneity, some popular accounts mistakenly assert that the big bang model cannot account for the observed lumpiness of the universe. In a strictly FLRW model, there are no clusters of galaxies, stars or people, since these are objects much denser than a typical part of the universe. ”

Well, if Big Bang theory can not give any dynamical behavior, can it give any kinematic behavior. See my cosmology paper for a better understanding of this point of view [1]:

“The universe is full of materials most of which are galaxies. Observations show that the materials are uniformly distributed at large scales. They move with respect to each other. Today’s Big Bang cosmology is based on the assumption that the motion have no absolute reference. If there were no absolute reference then the universe would be unknowable and there would be no law in the observational data about the large-scale universe. However, several years after Einstein had proposed his general relativity and cosmology, Hubble discovered an important law about the universe, called the Hubble redshift law. It says that distant galaxies issue redshifted spectra which are proportional to their respective distances from earth. Big Bang cosmology assumes that galaxies ran away from us and the expansion led to the redshifts as runaway trains give the static audience the sound waves of weaker frequencies. However, if there were no convergent movement among the distant galaxies then some galaxies would move towards the earth at fantastic speeds. The speeds would be so large that they would overwhelm the expansion and hit the earth directly. In that case, the galaxies would issue blueshifted spectra rather than redshifted ones. However, distant galaxies always present redshifted spectra and the redshifts are proportional to their distances from Earth. ”

It turns out that the Big Bang theory of life creation requires that every particle in the universe (galaxies, etc.) be still!! There is no relative movement between any two particles in the universe. Even the things of kinematics do not exist in the theory:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comoving_coordinates #Comoving_coordinates

“Most large lumps of matter, such as galaxies, are nearly comoving, ie, their peculiar velocities (due to gravitational attraction) are low.

The comoving time coordinate is the elapsed time since the Big Bang according to a clock of a comoving observer and is a measure of cosmological time. The comoving spatial coordinates tell us where an event occurs while cosmological time tells us when an event occurs. Together, they form a complete coordinate system, giving us both the location and time of an event.

Space in comoving coordinates is usually referred to as being “static”, as most bodies on the scale of galaxies or larger are approximately comoving, and comoving bodies have static, unchanging comoving coordinates. So for a given pair of comoving galaxies, while the proper distance between them would have been smaller in the past and will become larger in the future due to the expansion of space, the comoving distance between them remains constant at all times. ”

You might ask a question: Since the Big Bang theory demonstrates dead and still matter, what are the many cosmologists doing? How do they describe the origin of galaxies?

As a honest scientist in Mathematics, high energy theoretical physics, and astrophysics, I tell you the truth: those cosmologists are using Hydromechanics (a kinematical stuff) to explain galaxy formation, dust creation, and the origin of life. They have been recognized by Vatican.

References:

[1] He J. viXra: 1101.0077 http://vixra.org/pdf/1101.0077v1.pdf